View videos of our 2016 Symposium, Disjointed Regulation: State Efforts to Legalize Marijuana, here.
Congratulations to Volume 50 Articles Editor Olga Bykov for her Honorable Mention in the James Boskey ADR Writing Competition. Look for another of her articles in our February issue.
Ranked thirty-fifth among student-run legal journals in the United States, the UC Davis Law Review publishes scholarly articles from legal academics, practitioners, and student editors. The Review's staff prides itself on consistently meeting deadlines while working with authors to produce the highest quality scholarship. Each academic year, the student staff publishes one volume composed of five issues. This year, the Review staff is excited to publish its fiftieth volume.
Fifty years after Miranda v. Arizona, significant numbers of innocent suspects are falsely confessing to crimes while subject to police custodial interrogation. Critics on the left and right have proposed reforms to Miranda, but few such proposals are appropriately targeted to the problem of false confessions. Using rigorous psychological evidence of the causes of false confessions, this Article analyzes the range of proposals and develops a realistic set of reforms — Miranda 2.0 — which is directed specifically at this foundational challenge to the justice system. Miranda 2.0 is long overdue; it should require: warning suspects how long they can be interrogated for; delivering the warnings via a non-police intermediary, preferably a pre-approved audio-visual recording; recording all interrogations; varying the strength of the warnings according to characteristics that make suspects differently susceptible; and reforming and simplifying the rules of waiver. This Article establishes why each of these proposals most effectively combats the problem of false confessions and how each can be realistically implemented, without overly burdening police efficiency and efficacy.