Congratulations to Volume 49 Executive Editor David Ligtenberg for winning second place in the California Supreme Court Historical Society's 2015 Student Writing Competition. His paper, "Inverse Condemnation: California's Widening Loophole," will be published in the Society's journal California Legal History in December 2015.
Forthcoming UC Davis Law Review article featured in The Wall Street Journal. Professor Kent Barnett's "Against Administrative Judges" will appear in Vol. 49, Issue 5. Click here for WSJ piece.
Ranked thirty-first among legal journals in the United States, the UC Davis Law Review publishes scholarly articles from legal academics, practitioners, and student editors. The Review's staff prides itself on consistently meeting deadlines while working with authors to produce the highest quality scholarship. Each academic year, the student staff publishes one volume composed of five issues. This year, the Review staff is excited to publish its forty-ninth volume.
How Litigants Evaluate the Characteristics of Legal Procedures: A Multi-Court Empirical Study
This Article presents findings from the first multi-court field study examining how civil litigants evaluate the characteristics of legal procedures shortly after their cases are filed in state court. Analyses revealed that litigants evaluated the characteristics in terms of control — i.e., whether the characteristics granted relative control to the litigants themselves or to third parties (e.g., mediators, judges). Although the litigants indicated a desire to be present for the resolution process, they preferred third-party control to litigant control. They also wanted third parties to control the process more than the outcome. Gender, age group, and case-type significantly predicted attraction to third-party control, whereas attraction to litigant control was predicted by whether litigants had a pre-existing relationship with each other, how much they valued a future relationship with the opposing party, party type, the type of opposing party, and court location. Implications for legal policy and lawyering are discussed.